Literature review and related papers
Find publications close to your reference papers with SPECTER2. Organise prior work by topic and review its relevance to your study.
Industries / 07 / Industry and science
Research and science
AI for universities, research centres and scientific teams: literature review, table extraction, Earth observation and experimental image analysis.
Connect publications and observations to your notebooks. Compare methods, retain sources and spend more time interpreting results.
Universities and research centres
Work with publications, images and datasets while keeping source references for every result.
Find publications close to your reference papers with SPECTER2. Organise prior work by topic and review its relevance to your study.
Convert pages and tables with Granite Docling to prepare datasets of published results. Check units, notes and references before comparing them.
Adapt Prithvi to satellite imagery to study land cover and environmental change. Evaluate on held-out regions and dates.
Use DINOv2 visual features to explore similarity and adapt sample or material classifiers. Check performance against labelled images.
With QDivZero / Research and science
Connect papers and images to your notebook, apply the appropriate model and retain versions and references. Compare outputs against a sample reviewed by your team.
Open-weight / Research and science
SPECTER2 for related papers, Granite Docling for pages and tables, Prithvi for Earth observation and DINOv2 for visual features. Evaluate each model using data from your study.
Paper similarity · English
Represent English titles and abstracts to find related papers with the proximity adapter.
Base model + proximity adapterView modelDocument conversion
Convert publication pages into structured text and tables to prepare a research corpus or dataset.
Hugging Face referenceView modelEarth observation
Geospatial foundation model for adapting tasks with multispectral, multitemporal satellite imagery.
Hugging Face referenceView modelVisual features
Visual features for exploring similarity and training classifiers adapted to your experimental images.
Hugging Face referenceView modelResearch and science
It can retrieve related papers, organise a corpus and prepare screening fields. SPECTER2 compares English scientific titles and abstracts; its proximity adapter suits searches starting from a reference paper. For a systematic review, retain the search strategy, inclusion criteria and team decisions: similarity does not guarantee an exhaustive search.
Prepare titles and abstracts and retain DOIs or other identifiers. For related-paper retrieval, combine allenai/specter2_base with the allenai/specter2 adapter following its documentation. Short-query search uses a different configuration. Share the model, adapter and dependencies for deployment compatibility review; a base checkpoint alone is not a complete integration.
Granite Docling can convert pages into structured text and tables. Your pipeline should retain the source paper, page and table and review headers, units, notes and values. Then define which findings are comparable by method and experimental conditions. Document conversion prepares the data; selection and normalisation depend on your study.
The linked variant works with multispectral, multitemporal imagery. Prepare bands, resolution, dates and normalisation according to its documentation; an RGB screenshot does not replace those inputs. For land-cover or change-detection tasks, use study labels and hold out distinct regions or periods to evaluate generalisation.
You can evaluate its visual features as a starting point for image comparison or an adapted classifier. The checkpoint does not include a validated detector for your instrument or measure cells or defects on its own. Use labelled samples and check changes in lighting, scale and equipment before incorporating it into analysis.
Your code prepares inputs, queries the model when deployment is compatible and collects outputs for analysis. Retain each paper, image or sample identifier. For models with adapters or specialist preprocessing, review those dependencies when defining the endpoint; the notebook coordinates the study’s different stages.
Fix a dataset version, record the checkpoint, adapters, preprocessing and parameters, and retain evaluation code. Compare all models on the same splits and against a baseline. Separate training and evaluation by study, instrument, region or date where appropriate to reduce information leakage.
Test a representative batch and measure time and memory per page, paper or image. Include resolution, number of dates and batch size in the estimate. Separate initial corpus processing from updates: retaining results and recomputing only changed inputs can reduce repeated work.
Store DOI, source, date and version with each record. When a publication is corrected or retracted, update its status and derived data and identify affected analyses. Your integration chooses which sources participate in each search and retains the selection used in an experiment for later review.
Share your corpus or image type, the output you need and how you will evaluate results. We help assess the model and its deployment.